Pattern Language Audit

This sprint carried the inventory contract by itself: derive the accepted surface from schema, evaluator, bundled patterns, and world seams. That was a good isolated cut because it did not ask the worker to settle semantics, only to name every line and give each one a status for later agents. The boundary held cleanly.

This sprint made the fake world record language-relevant inputs, turning hidden interpreter calls into typed observations. The work depended on the inventory's list of observability needs and could stay narrow because it did not need to add the full conformance matrix. It completed without recorded recovery.

This sprint added the negative half of the same fake-world contract: failures had to be injectable at the operation that caused them. The brief kept production effects out of scope and asked only for honest halt reachability, which left a clear testing boundary. It landed green.

This sprint turned the passive inventory into an executable registry shape. Its charge was small but structural: give later workers a naming, assembly, and reconciliation pattern before they started adding cases. The cut completed cleanly.

This sprint covered deterministic steps before orchestration-heavy constructs entered the picture. The brief kept the worker on gate, goal check, git, map-spec validation, and termination outcomes, so failures would point to primitive semantics rather than surrounding flow. It passed without recovery.

This sprint isolated the agent-step matrix: result, failure policy, produced output, degraded defaults, grounding, and modifiers. That was the right unit because agent results are reused inside almost every larger pattern shape. The run facts show it stayed green.

This sprint separated the rule language from the constructs that invoke it. It was asked to cover matching, conditions, counters, qualifiers, and run-block resumption before loops or fan-out leaned on those decisions. The boundary held with a green finish.

This sprint gave sequential loop and work-list behavior its own proof surface. It had an extra gate pass but no recorded repair, which marks validation pressure rather than a changed plan. The brief kept rule semantics as inherited evidence and focused the worker on loop state.

This sprint handled fan-out as a primitive rather than a loop variant. The brief gave a large but coherent control-flow surface: classification, admission, worker bodies, counters, side loops, finalizers, and drain behavior. It completed without a retry.

This sprint isolated the newest inner-unit language surface so it did not remain driver-shaped. It had another repeated gate check, but the task stayed inside channel, cache, operation, predicate, and halt semantics. No recovery was recorded.

This sprint focused on the boundary between patterns: invocation, parameter passing, substitution, structural identity, nested counters, and run entry state. The brief was medium-sized because it avoided the surrounding rule and world-effect matrices. It landed as part of the green milestone ledger.

This sprint closed the loader and compatibility leftovers after the earlier semantic slices had exposed disputed surface. The run facts show it as a clean continuation under a replanned milestone shape. Its job was adjudication, not broad new runtime behavior.

This is where the cut first visibly fought back. The brief says an earlier attempt was too broad and had produced matrix-like citations rather than executable shared contracts, so the sprint was narrowed and replanned around a small harness slice. The recovery record belongs here because the difficulty was proving world effects, not interpreter syntax.

This sprint also hit the same pressure point: the previous scope had tried to close too many production worlds at once. The replanned brief kept the identifier but reduced the deliverable to the goal-world contract slice, and the run record shows both retry and replan activity before it settled. The final boundary was a concrete production adapter, not all remaining runtime effects.

This sprint was renamed by reality before it could become the final guard sprint. The brief records that production-world coverage was still too unsettled, so the work became a per-promise evidence index for the shared and goal slices. Its retry and replan history shows the review forcing granularity before more coverage was added.

This sprint moved from generic shared contracts into the gated task set production world. The brief gave it a full but single-adapter surface: gates, scoped git, modifier tokens, inner-unit effects, rosters, latches, and unsupported promises. It ran cleanly after the matrix index existed.

This sprint grouped the loop-style production adapters after the gated task set was indexed. The scope was still high, but it excluded map fan-out and final guards, giving a fresh agent a coherent family of worlds with nested-work behavior. The run facts show no recovery on this slice.

This sprint saved the fan-out adapter for its own pass because map semantics combine pool dispatch, classification, checkpoints, artifacts, finalizers, and production tokens. By this point the evidence-index rules were already in place, so the worker could add rows instead of designing the matrix again. It completed without a recorded repair.

This sprint finally took the guard work after the world contracts had been split and closed. The brief depended on the completed registry and matrix, which made the task a durable enforcement pass rather than another coverage expansion. It landed green once the broad production placeholders were gone.

This sprint turned registry and inventory data into a machine-checkable coverage surface. The brief asked for drift to become visible when a new accepted construct appears without evidence, a narrow task because it depended on already-authored coverage. It finished through the retry-shaped milestone ledger without a recorded recovery entry.

This sprint sampled whether the conformance suite actually observes semantics. It was not a new mutation product; the brief asked for ordinary test hooks that perturb meaningful interpreter behavior and then disappear after each test. The boundary was small enough to fit after the coverage declaration.

This sprint reconciled the evidence artifacts after guard work, and the run facts show failed planning attempts before it found the right shape. Its task was to remove stale exemptions, over-broad claims, and temporary proof edits rather than expand the language. The final row finished green.

This sprint audited the world-contract evidence as an index instead of a loose set of examples. It was asked to name every promise, its worlds, its required observable behavior, and the terminal state still needed. The gate repeated after execution, but no replan was recorded.

This sprint consumed the gap list and closed the remaining production world-effect promises. The brief made it responsible for executable evidence or defensible terminal rationale across repository state, gates, snapshots, restores, nested dispatch, resume behavior, task state, fan-out, and latches. It completed through the retry-shaped milestone ledger.

This sprint was the closeout pass, and the ledger says the bar was already satisfied when it ran. Its work was to reconcile inventory, registry, matrix, mutation manifest, spec obligations, and compatibility decisions into a final acceptance state. That made it a verification boundary rather than another feature slice.